Drive Capital’s Second Act: Columbus Venture Firm Rises After Co-Founder Split

Columbus-based Drive Capital has emerged as one of the Midwest's prominent venture firms, not only weathering disruption from a major leadership split, but also posting headline-making returns in the current venture climate. This article explores how an unorthodox approach and a focus away from the usual coastal tech hubs has positioned the firm for a strong second act.

Venture Capital's Midwest Dilemma

Historically, the Midwest has experienced cycles of interest and neglect from venture capitalists, with investors eager during boom periods and pulling back when markets sour. Columbus-based Drive Capital was not immune. Several years ago, the firm faced internal turmoil with the departure of co-founder Mark Kvamme, an event that could have spelled its end. Instead, the split may have catalyzed Drive's resurgence.

A $500 Million Milestone and Unique Strategy

In May, Drive captured industry attention by returning $500 million to its investors in a single week. This included $140 million worth of Root Insurance shares alongside proceeds from the sales of Austin's Thoughtful Automation and another firm. This liquidity event is rare in today's venture market and signaled renewed confidence among the firm's limited partners.

Chris Olsen, now the sole managing partner, attributes Drive’s success to a deliberately contrarian strategy. Rather than chasing elusive “unicorns” valued in the tens of billions, Drive targets more frequent, scalable outcomes—such as exits around $3 billion. Olsen notes that while only a dozen American companies have reached $50 billion+ exits in the past two decades, over a hundred have exited at $3 billion or more, either through IPOs or acquisition. Drive seeks meaningful stakes—often averaging 30%—and routinely acts as the only VC in its portfolio companies.

Deep Founder Analysis

Why it matters

The transformation at Drive Capital highlights a growing decentralization of venture success away from Silicon Valley. For founders and investors alike, this demonstrates that innovations outside major tech hubs are increasingly viable paths to significant exits—and that resilience, not just geography or pedigree, now shapes the trajectory of enduring VC firms. Startups operating in the Midwest or in overlooked regions should see this as validation to raise and scale locally without needing immediate coastal backers.

Risks & opportunities

There is a substantial opportunity for venture capital to unlock value in "traditional" industries by applying technology in new markets such as insurance, manufacturing, or logistics. However, the risk remains that coastal VCs could crowd back in if exits accelerate, increasing competition and reducing local firms’ advantages. Drive’s focus on larger ownership and patient capital provides insulation, but firms must continually refine value-add to stay ahead.

Startup idea or application

An original venture opportunity could be a SaaS platform specifically designed for regional VCs, enabling deal sourcing, local founder development, and co-investment syndication in under-served metros. This would help democratize access to capital and bolster regional innovation ecosystems, making such milestone liquidity events more common outside the usual epicenters.

Portfolio Performance: Highs and Lows

Drive Capital’s portfolio reflects both impressive wins and tough losses. Early investments in Duolingo (now an $18 billion NASDAQ-listed company) and Vast Data (last valued at $9 billion) stand out. The firm also realized contested gains from Root Insurance, despite its volatile post-IPO journey. Yet, not all bets delivered; Olive AI, a Columbus-based healthcare automation company, famously unraveled after raising over $900 million and once being valued at $4 billion.

Olsen emphasizes that producing returns during both economic booms and downturns is vital. A distinguishing feature for Drive is investing in businesses outside the frothy Silicon Valley ecosystem, often as the sole VC. The firm has branched into six cities and tends to back companies that seek proximity to their customers, not just investors.

The Drive Philosophy: Beyond Silicon Valley

Drive Capital champions the notion that startups outside major hubs must reach higher operational benchmarks to secure funding, leading to more robust business models. Its portfolio leans into applying tech solutions to core industries—like autonomous welding and next-generation dental insurance—over flashy, consumer-facing innovation. This approach leverages America’s vast $18 trillion economy beyond the coasts.

Fundraising and Future Outlook

The future trajectory for Drive is promising but still unknown. The firm is currently deploying a $1 billion fund (raised before Kvamme's exit), with about 30% left to invest. According to Olsen, Drive’s mature funds are top-quartile performers, offering “over 4x net returns,” and the firm continues to grow assets under management currently totaling $2.2 billion.

Columbus’s ascendance as a tech hub was further validated by recent news that tech leaders like Palmer Luckey and Peter Thiel will headquarter a new crypto-focused bank in the city. Olsen reflects on the arc: “When we started Drive in 2012, people thought we were nuts. Now you’re seeing some of the smartest minds in technology building outside Silicon Valley.”

Related Reading

For more analysis of trends in regional venture and startup growth, read: Jon McNeill’s Operator Playbook: Building Sustainable Startups at TechCrunch All Stage 2025.

Venture Capital Midwest Startups Drive Capital Startup Ecosystems Portfolio Management

Visit Deep Founder to learn how to start your own startup, validate your idea, and build it from scratch.

📚 Read more articles in our Deep Founder blog.