Sign in Subscribe
AI

Sam Altman Takes On The New York Times: OpenAI’s Legal Battles, Media Tensions, and Startup Opportunities

Sam Altman addressing the audience at a tech event, looking serious.

Image Credit: Eugene Gologursky / Getty Images for the New York Times

An Unconventional Interview: OpenAI Leadership Confronts the Media

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and COO Brad Lightcap made a dramatic entrance at a live recording of the ‘Hard Fork’ podcast with journalists from The New York Times and Platformer, held at a packed San Francisco venue. The atmosphere shifted immediately as Altman preemptively addressed the ongoing lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI concerning the alleged unauthorized use of media content for training AI models.

Altman didn’t wait for introductions before referencing the legal battle, pointedly challenging the Times’ stance on consumer data. He criticized the newspaper for demanding that OpenAI retain user logs, even for private mode conversations or those the users had asked to be deleted. “Still love The New York Times, but that one we feel strongly about,” he remarked, injecting tension—and transparency—into the conversation.

The Altman-Lightcap appearance spotlighted a broader trend: legal action by major publishers against AI companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta for leveraging copyrighted content to build generative models. These cases contend that AI threatens to erode or even replace the value of original journalistic work. However, tides may be shifting, as a recent federal court win for Anthropic signaled that training AI on copyrighted books can be legal in some cases—a precedent that could influence the fate of similar lawsuits against OpenAI and its peers.

Deep Founder Analysis

Why it matters

This situation sits at the intersection of artificial intelligence advancement and intellectual property rights—two critical frontiers for innovative startups. The high-stakes conflict signals that the immunity tech giants once enjoyed is evaporating. For founders, this means future AI products have to be defensible and compliant by design. Legal clarity (or lack thereof) will shape fundraising, go-to-market plans, and even technical architecture. As legal lines get drawn, startup differentiation may come increasingly from novel ways to respect IP while enabling powerful AI functionality.

Risks & opportunities

The risk: The media’s campaign for compensation may result in regulatory or legal frameworks that increase data acquisition costs or restrict model training, raising the entry barrier for smaller players. AI upstarts might be sued before they scale—unless they proactively build transparent, auditable data pipelines. On the opportunity side, startups can build tools that monitor, track, or license content for AI training. Providers that offer compliance-as-a-service or data provenance solutions could thrive, especially as enterprises look for legal AI.

Startup idea or application

Inspired by the current standoff, a startup could create standardized, blockchain-enabled ‘AI Content Licenses’—an API and dashboard for publishers and AI companies to track usage, grant rights, and share revenue in real-time. This would streamline compliance for both sides, allow media to monetize content for training, and act as a technical (and legal) trust layer.

OpenAI’s Leadership on Offense—and Defense

Throughout the discussion, Altman made it clear that OpenAI faces challenges on multiple fronts. Referencing recent efforts by Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg to lure OpenAI talent with lucrative packages, Altman and Lightcap discussed the escalating ‘AI talent wars.’ Lightcap joked that Zuckerberg “believes he is superintelligent,” signaling rivalries that now extend to talent as well as technology.

Questions about OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft highlighted another point of friction. While both companies have historically benefited from their alliance, competition is heating up, especially in the enterprise sector. Altman acknowledged tensions but suggested the partnership’s value would endure despite inevitable flashpoints.

Pushing Back Against Techlash and Highlighting Responsibility

The podcast touched on a key challenge facing AI leaders: managing the risks of advanced AI systems. Altman detailed OpenAI’s approach to mitigating harm, such as cutting off certain user interactions and referring at-risk users to professional help. However, he admitted the industry is still struggling to reach those on the edge—people using AI in moments of mental health crisis or to explore troubling rabbit holes.

Relevant Reading from Deep Founder

AI OpenAI Media Lawsuit Startup Opportunity Tech Ethics

Visit Deep Founder to learn how to start your own startup, validate your idea, and build it from scratch.

📚 Read more articles in our Deep Founder blog.

Read next

Comments ()